4/16/2023 0 Comments Insecticides and pesticides brands![]() It is one of the top 10 pesticide companies in India. Get The Full List of Top Pesticides Companies in India by – Click hereĪimco Pesticides Ltd was founded in the year 1987. ![]() Top 10 Pesticides Companies in IndiaĬheck the following list of top 10 Pesticides companies in India. Demonstrating their efficacy in the farmer field is critical for farmer adoption and scaling up the commercialisation of such technologies and products.ĭey is faculty member of Agribusiness Management, and Tripathi is an EFPM Scholar, IIM Lucknow.Top 10 Pesticides companies in India. In sum, ICAR-funded agri-research institutions need to provide an enabling environment for scientists or researchers to invent and register patents of products enabling climate-smart sustainable farming. States can augment the sales of bio-pesticide and plant growth regulators for organic farming, extend grants and concessional loans to MSMEs and cooperatives/producer companies, and agri-business incubators for innovative circular initiatives in agri-risk management, and promote evidence-based research on pesticides impact on farming communities and public health, nutrition. The government can broaden and deepen integrated pest and weed management technologies and practices in line with the national mission on natural farming. Second, social and economic dimensions are also key to sustainability. Also, the pesticide industry should follow a responsible business protocol by examining the long-term impact of active ingredients of pesticides on the environment. However, two heavily used Class 1 pesticides, Monocrotophos and Carbofuram, are yet to be banned. It is worth noting that the Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers’ Welfare banned 18 pesticides following Verma Committee’s recommendation in 2018. For this, the Pesticide Management Bill 2020 should be implemented to address the existing shortcomings of existing laws concerning pesticide registration, worker and end users’ protection, and immunity to pesticide business and promotion.Īs the Bill emphasised banning extremely and highly hazardous, especially Class 1a & 1b chemical pesticides, the government should promote non-hazardous formulations of pesticides. A participatory guarantee system may be ineffective in recognising contaminated food products without a robust traceability system.įirst, agri-policies should consider ESG dimensions embracing circular initiatives in food and biomass. Third, e-marketplace-driven pesticide sales would increase the tolerance of maximum residue limits supported by a cartel of technology and pesticide manufacturing firms in an oligopolistic agrochemicals market. There is no mechanism for periodic checks on the registered pesticides as per toxicology guidelines. However, this legislation does not have adequate regulatory provisions to avoid deaths, minimise farm workers’ health hazards, or prevent environmental and food contamination. ![]() Second, the Insecticides Act 1968 and Insecticides Rules 1971 regulate the end-to-end supply chain of insecticides (pesticides) to prevent hazards and exposure, including human and animal lives. These particles make the air toxic and enter the food chains, posing a threat to consumers. For example, pesticide residues accumulate in the plant, enter the soil, and contaminate groundwater due to leaching, vaporisation, and spray drifts. Studies have shown that there would be a 78 per cent loss of fruit output, 54 per cent loss of vegetable and 32 per cent loss of cereal production.ĭespite short-term productivity gains, the toxicity associated with applying “excessive” dosage harms the soil, water, air, flora, fauna, and so on. About one-third of agricultural products depend on the application of pesticides. First, online pesticide sales can impact bio-pesticide consumption as chemical pesticides produce “quick results” for farmers. Investors may be attracted to invest in new pesticide technical, and agrochemical firms can take the IPO route to mop up funds. As a result, spurious or fake pesticide sales will be arrested significantly.Īgri-tech start-ups and pesticide firms can strengthen their upstream marketplace model by leveraging digital platforms’ direct and indirect network effects. Farmer producer organisations (FPOs) through online buying can cut transaction cost and share their feedback to improve user experience with the multi-stored brands and compare the price points of available pesticide brands. The government’s decision has some positives. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |